Progress:
Pronunciation: \ˈprä-grəs, -ˌgres, US also & British usually ˈprō-ˌgres\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French progrés, from Latin progressus advance, from progredi to go forth, from pro- forward + gradi to go — more at PRO-, GRADE
Date: 15th century
1 a) 1): a royal journey marked by pomp and pageant 2): a state procession b): a tour or circuit made by an official (as a judge) c): an expedition, journey, or march through a region
2: a forward or onward movement (as to an objective or to a goal) : ADVANCE
3: gradual betterment; especially: the progressive development of humankind
When I hear the word ‘progress’, the overall idea that comes to my mind is a combination of definitions 2 and 3 – a forward movement producing betterment. There are a couple of interesting things worth noting in this definition. First, there is movement, meaning change. Things are not staying the same. Second, this movement is forward in direction, not backwards. By ‘forward’ it is meant that the change is to new things, not a return to old or previous paradigms. And third, the result of the forward change is a production of something beneficial.
For the most part, these ideas embodied in the word ‘progress’ hold true. As it applies to the automotive industry, we see progress leading to automobiles that are safer, more fuel efficient, and more comfortable. In the technology world, progress leads to cheaper devices that are faster, smaller, and more capable. And the list can go on and on – better cleaning products that are environmentally safe, new clothing materials that are more durable and longer-lasting, new building materials that are stronger and lighter, etc, etc, etc. It’s all progress!
However (you knew that was coming, didn’t you?), there are things in which forward change is not beneficial or produce things that are better. Things that rely on or are based on absolutes, when changed, do not produce things that are better. Take the recent financial meltdown, for instance. When the absolutes of financing are not adhered to, calamity ensues. There are reasons for the rules and regulations.
What does progress look like in the realm of politics? The Constitution is written with the presupposition that it is an absolute. It is the foundation upon which all is built and against which all is measured. To move away from the ideas it embodies is to move toward detriment. Take the First Amendment, for instance. The First Amendment reads:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The plain reading of the first part of this (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion) means that Congress (the guys and gals in Washington, D.C.) cannot make a law (the rules that are debated, agreed to, and then signed by the President that determine what is and is not permissible in this country) that establishes (creates) a religion. It means exactly what it says. To say that the phrase ‘separation of church and state’ summarizes it is not accurate. To then apply this inaccurate phrase to say we cannot pray before a football game or have the Ten Commandments on the courthouse lawn is a slippery slope on which several steps have already been taken and actually does what the next phrase ( prohibit the free exercise thereof) says not to do! For sure, this is not progress. The Constitution does not need progress – it needs adherence.
In Christianity, we see ‘progress’ producing similar results. The Bible is the foundation and the rule. When we get away from it and what it says, we are on a slippery slope. To proclaim a new gospel is to profane and pervert the true Gospel. To tell people to invite Jesus into their hearts instead of calling them to repentance is to create false converts that become twice the sons of Hell. To minister with those of other faiths is to endorse their beliefs. To allow and even condone homosexuality is to ignore God-given truth. To add works to the cross is to steal Christ of His due reward. Christ does not require progress – He requires obedience. Paul wrote to Timothy:
As I urged you upon my departure for Macedonia, remain on at Ephesus so that you may instruct certain men not to teach strange doctrines, nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies, which give rise to mere speculation rather than furthering the administration of God which is by faith. But the goal of our instruction is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith. For some men, straying from these things, have turned aside to fruitless discussion, wanting to be teachers of the Law, even though they do not understand either what they are saying or the matters about which they make confident assertions. But we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted. -1Timothy 1:3-11
For all who preach and teach, we would be wise to follow Paul’s advice. Call doing otherwise progress if you want, the Bible says it’s progress to Hell.